A pyramid organizational structure is commonly used in the management field. The top layer consists of management and administrative personnel, followed by a second layer of supervisors, managers, and directors.
What is a management pyramid?
A management pyramid, also known as a hierarchical structure, is an organizational structure consisting of a single leader at the top and layers of ever bigger management teams below them. One might imagine the structure of these types of organizations to resemble a pyramid.
Each management level is accountable for the level directly under them. Instead of the person at the top managing everyone’s work, employees collaborate more closely with the managers immediately above them.
Each level is responsible for communicating the expectations or messages of their immediate superiors.
Benefits of pyramid structure for management
These are some of the key advantages of a pyramidal management structure:
With a pyramidal organizational structure, it is simple to determine each manager’s level of power and responsibility. This makes it easier to determine who to report to for specific duties or inquiries.
A management pyramid can increase departmental loyalty since employees may develop deep relationships with their bosses and immediate coworkers. Rather of aiming to impress those at the top of the organization, you focus on assisting your immediate manager and team members.
Individuals in a firm may be more motivated to work hard and create a good impression if they believe they have the opportunity to advance. This can lead to increased workplace productivity.
This structure is advantageous for firms that require professionals for a variety of projects. Instead of concentrating on the company’s overall objectives, you might concentrate your attention to your area of competence.
Disadvantages of a management pyramid
Here are a few of the drawbacks of this management structure:
Since there are more administrative features to this organization, it may be more difficult to make rapid adjustments. When considering a policy change or launching a new program, there are more individuals to consult.
Since this structure might make it difficult for corporate executives to engage with lower-level employees, these employees may feel as though their work is being ignored by management. This may result in decreased involvement and output from low-level employees.
Longer chain of communication
Instead of speaking directly to the CEO, you must relay your views and concerns through your direct management, who will then relay them to his or her boss, and so on. This makes it difficult to provide feedback to senior managers and company executives.
The Understanding Pyramid Organization Structure
A pyramidal organizational structure has one CEO at the top, a small executive leadership team below, and levels of managers leading down to the employees. Each level of management oversees the level below it, so distributing responsibilities more equitably.
It is intended to guarantee that each employee is better serviced by a manager who can give individualized attention to his small team.
The pyramid organizational structure, also known as the hierarchical organizational structure, believes that information will be transferred down the chain.
Therefore, if the CEO meets with the tiny leadership team beneath him, those leaders will meet with the small tier of leaders beneath them and pass through the knowledge, which will then be shared with the subsequent layer.
There are certain drawbacks with pyramidal systems, such as the fact that knowledge does not always cascade down to the bottom.
One manager neglecting to inform his staff is all it takes for communication to go down. It can also cause employees to feel separated from the executives at the top, who communicate directly with only those directly under them.
Reasoning for Flipping the Pyramid
Imagine the pyramid inverted such that the entire base of employees is on top and the top leadership is on the bottom. It does not imply that the executive team is irrelevant, but it does indicate that employees are making a greater number of everyday choices. In lieu of top executives making choices that trickle down to workers, inverting the pyramid empowers workers to make the majority of their own decisions without consulting management first.
Putting workers at the top also demonstrates that the firm respects and trusts its employees to make sound judgments. According to the notion, the interactions your customers have with your company influence whether they will continue to do business with you or not, and your employees are the ones that engage with consumers.
The CEO and the rest of the leadership team continue to determine the company’s direction, but they rely on employees to make decisions that keep consumers satisfied.
Using this strategy, there is typically a smaller wage gap between CEOs and workers, since when people are properly compensated, they recognize that the firm values the labor they provide.
Other types of management structures
Flat Organizational Structure
To have a better understanding of the pyramid form, it is useful to study the opposing approach, a flat organizational structure. In recent years, as companies aim for a more informal, laid-back work environment, flat layouts have grown incredibly popular, particularly among tiny startups.
This structure promotes an open office environment in which every employee feels in direct communication with the leadership team, therefore increasing her sense of investment in the organization as a whole.
With a flat organizational structure, the middle management seen in pyramid-style companies is abolished, and top management directly supervises personnel such as shop floor workers and salesmen.
This may comprise a single manager controlling a few of staff in a small organization. As a firm expands, however, numerous leaders may be recruited to assist the CEO or president in supervising huge staff teams.
The flat organizational structure is less scalable than the pyramidal form. A company with 20 employees may easily function with a single manager who communicates with all employees. Imagine, though, having 100 or 1,000 people reporting directly to you.
Even if you have 20 managers, each of whom directly supervises 50 people, it will be difficult to keep up with 20 managers, each of whom will struggle to manage the large number of employees beneath them.
Flatarchy Organizational Structure
Due to the fact that both alternatives have drawbacks, many organizations are increasingly choosing for a middle ground. A flatarchy is a mix of the two techniques, allowing a small firm established as a flat organization to manage its expansion without alienating existing personnel.
In a flatarchy, teams are compartmentalized according on the nature of the task being performed. A flat organization with a specific project, for instance, can designate a team leader and disband the team as soon as the project concludes. This adaptability makes flatarchy popular among firms that outgrow their flat organizational structure.
A functional structure resembles a pyramid in that there are fewer high-level supervisors at the top and more workers at the bottom. The primary distinction between these two management structures is that a functional structure divides into several smaller pyramids dependent on the company’s demands. For instance, you may have one pyramid for the finance department and another for marketing. Each pyramid is based on the talents and duties of its personnel.
This structure provides employees with the opportunity to become specialists in their field of work, which is advantageous for businesses. Teams are able to concentrate on their individual initiatives and become closer to their immediate colleagues. This organization has the potential to impede communication between departments, which is a disadvantage. Employees may focus more on their particular divisions than on the company’s larger objectives.
A matrix structure is a kind of management that is more flexible and resembles a grid. While some employees may have regular responsibilities, this management style is mostly focused on projects. Who reports to whom is determined mostly by project, therefore employees’ duties and tasks may change when they begin a new project.
This management system affords employees the opportunity to demonstrate their skills and knowledge. It is also advantageous for individuals who want non-repetitive work that allows them to utilize their expertise in diverse ways.
It might be difficult to keep up with the changes in management, which is a significant drawback of this structure. In order to minimize misunderstanding, managers must learn how to collaborate with one another successfully.
With a divisional structure, each division functions as a subset of the greater total. Each division has its own operations, processes, and resources as opposed to partnering with the other divisions of the organization. This structure is common among large organizations, as it grants each section greater autonomy and influence. Different divisions may exist depending on the type of market, product line, or region.
Large organizations can benefit from the customization offered by this structure. Rather of a single major firm attempting to suit the needs of consumers worldwide, a specialized division might concentrate on a market. This structure’s downsides include a lack of resource coordination and the potential of a firm acting against itself.
A management pyramid, also known as a hierarchical structure, is an organizational structure with a single leader at the top and layers of ever bigger management teams below. The structure of such organizations resembles a pyramid.
Each level of management is accountable for the rung immediately below them. Employees work more closely with the supervisors directly above them, rather than the person at the top managing everyone’s work. It is the obligation of each level to communicate the directives or expectations of their immediate superiors.
- What Is a Commissions Expense? Definition, Overview, 8 Facts - September 17, 2022
- What are the Different Types of MLM Businesses? 5 Facts - September 17, 2022
- What Is Business Process Change? 7 Facts You Need To Know - September 16, 2022